Peer review Instructions

Review Assignments: You will receive 3 review requests per Work project once you have submitted your own draft.
If by the end of the course you have received fewer than 3 review requests, no requests, or too many requests please contact the teaching assistant.
Peer Review Tool: You must complete 3 peer reviews using the CGMap tool.
For instructions on how to use the CGMap tool, you can watch this video.
If needed for better viewing, you may view the work in CG Scholar creator while reviewing the work in CG Map.
Annotations
For an explanation of how to use coded annotations, please refer to the CG Map instructional video.
Review Length and Ratings: Providing constructive feedback is going to be the most helpful to the authors. Please write strong explanations in your comments. If you deduct a score explain why and how the author can improve. Even if you like a section and give full credit, explain what you liked and why.
Review content: Be kind to peers in your reviews! Be as helpful as you can, offering them constructive suggestions. Feedback should be unique (not copy/pasted) and be directly relevant to the work under the review section. Comments must be tailored to a specific work.
Review Submission: Wait until you have completed all pending reviews before submitting them. More ideas might come to you while you review another work.
Self-Review and Review the Reviewer:
Watch this video with instructions on how to create your Reviews.
Red Flags: Do not self-plagiarize, or copy work from updates or other courses. This must be new work. If you notice any problems with a work or the reviews you receive(e.g. plagiarism, offensive reviews), please inform the teaching assistant or instructor.